What Does It Mean To Be a Democrat an a Republican in 2012 Research Paper

What Does It Mean To Be a Democrat an a republican in 2012 - Research Paper ExampleThe united States first began to experience what could be termed political parties nearly as soon as our g everyplacenment was established. At this succession we had galore(postnominal) political debates between what were deemed federalists and anti-federalists. Ironically, this would serve as a harbinger of the two party system that invariably developed within the United States. Although tertiary parties existed and successfully sought office as last as the 1830s, their lifespan was short-lived by the take of two leviathans of political power that have successfully dominated the political environment in the United States for the better part of the past two hundred years. For the casual observer, party affiliation has a lovesome con nonation with regards to what belief systems the voter identifies himself/herself with. However, party affiliation is a figment of a given choice cycle. This is main ly due to the fact that there are no discernible party values or issues which can be definitively traced throughout history and once analyzed deemed as either firmly Republican or firmly republican issues/values. This intrinsic lack of definable/discernible values has disheartened many voters and forced them to become apolitical and/or apathetic. The Republican fellowship (Grand Ole Party) as we know it today but resembles the party that was born in 1854 out of an opposition to slavery. Elements of the nations political forces, fed up with the sin of slavery and determined to forge a path ahead for the United States that was free from this vice, opted to clear their own political entity. This Republican Party elected its first President in Abraham Lincoln. What is interesting to note, as far as an irony is concerned, is that the Republican Partys slogan in 1854 read, wanton Labor, Free Land, Free Men. This slogan had strong connection with the time due to the ongoing battle ov er slavery however, there appeared within it a uniquely socialist concept that most individuals have not considered. The statement free land referred to the fact that rich plantation owners were buying up all of the computable farm land and leaving the myopicer farmers left with the unwanted scraps and rejects/unviable land. The fact that the original Republican Party was entirely against the ability of a few wealthy individuals to lord over and control the fate of the poor was, at that time, an issue worthy of polarization between the Democratic and Republican Party interestingly, this is no continuing the case as it appears as if both parties only perennially work towards the benefits of those entities and corporations/individuals that bankroll their electoral campaigns. The Democratic Party on the other hand was born out of the Anti-Federalist movement of the 1790s. The Democratic Party of that time was of course defined by its rabid disagreement with Hamiltonian economics. Si milarly, the party was promoted originally as what would become cognize as the Democratic-Republican Party and had a decidedly constitutionalist approach as healthful as one that advocated the supreme authority of states rights as a doctrine of further self-determination among the young republic. This traditional understanding of the Democratic party survived more or less in tact up until the courteous War. At this time, the Democratic Party, under the leadership of key firebrands in the South, pushed for the continuation of slavery as well as